flywheel

Downstream → Upstream

5% of every fee → $LIQ.

LiquidPad consumes Liquid Protocol's primitives. In return, 5% of every trading fee on every shipped token routes to a $LIQ buyback on market — contract-enforced, no team intervention, every cycle a tx hash. This is the public ledger.

LIQ accumulated

1.07M

cumulative · all cycles

cycles complete

3

each one a tx onchain

avg LIQ / cycle

355.3K

market buy, sent to treasury

How the flywheel works

1

Trades happen on any LiquidPad-deployed token. Uniswap V4 pool collects 1% trading fees.

2

Liquid Protocol's FeeLocker splits accrued fees per the configured recipients: 80% deployer, 15% LPAD buyback & burn, 5% LIQ buyback.

3

The 5% slice swaps to $LIQ on Liquid Protocol's own market — adds buy pressure to the upstream token that powers the rail.

4

Every cycle is recorded to the public buyback ledger and surfaced via /api/burn. No admin can fake or skip a cycle.

Why 5% to $LIQ? LiquidPad is downstream of Liquid Protocol. Every token we ship consumes the SDK, the fee locker, and the V4 pools. The 5% is a contract-enforced acknowledgement: the more LiquidPad ships, the more buy pressure $LIQ catches. Distribution channel, not parasite.

Public cycle ledger

Date$LIQ boughtTx
May 21, 2026461.1K LIQ0x42da8c…ecc494
May 20, 2026411.7K LIQ0x21a197…8dcd21
May 17, 2026193.2K LIQ0x659e5a…abec9c

Source: /api/burn · cached 60s · revalidates from Liquid Protocol's onchain buyback ledger.

And the LPAD side

For symmetry: the same fee stream sends 15% to a $LPAD buyback & burn (sent to 0x…dEaD). Cumulative burned: 41.61M LPAD across 8 cycles.

Both sides of the split are public, both verifiable. The downstream/upstream relationship is bilateral: LiquidPad burns supply, $LIQ catches buy pressure. Different mechanics, same accountability.

Open infra wins. Always.

Built on Liquid Protocol's open primitives — credit goes to @_proxystudio, @m00npapi, and @liquid_launcher. LiquidPad is an independent third-party project, MIT licensed.